|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Moth *nix forums beginner
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:30 pm Post subject:
Slackware-10.0 Gtk+-2.0 discrepancies
|
|
|
I just had an interesting experience.
I decided I needed to start writing Gtk+ apps in 2.0, so I started out
with the helloworld code in the 2.0 tutorial. Cut and pasted. When I
tried to compile it, the errors looked like I was compiling the kernel:
just kept on rolling the screen!
After due consultation with the Gtk+ folk, I downloaded the source code
for the version of Gtk+ included with 10.0: gtk+2-2.4.3-i486-1. The
source code was gtk+-2.4.3. Compiled and installed it on the /usr/local
level.
Comparing the installed header files for gdk-pixbuf was a revelation:
wildly different! Looked like someone had added a bunch of stuff to
several header files and even included two *.xh files in the Slackware
package. What is going on here?
Where did Pat Volkerding get his packages? Or did he modify them
himself? I know he doesn't like Gnome, but have never heard anything
about the gtk code. Gtk+-1.2 works just fine, incidentally.
Anyone have a clue about this? My installation is still box stock: all
new stuff is at /usr/local, leaving /usr strictly distro stuff.
I guess the point is that unless this is resolved, I'll not be inclined
to trust Slackware development packages in the future, and that's a Bad
Thing (tm)!
Longfellow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moth *nix forums beginner
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 29
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:21 am Post subject:
Re: Slackware-10.0 Gtk+-2.0 discrepancies
|
|
|
On 2006-07-16, Longfellow <not@this.address> wrote:
| Quote: | I just had an interesting experience.
I decided I needed to start writing Gtk+ apps in 2.0, so I started out
with the helloworld code in the 2.0 tutorial. Cut and pasted. When I
tried to compile it, the errors looked like I was compiling the kernel:
just kept on rolling the screen!
After due consultation with the Gtk+ folk, I downloaded the source code
for the version of Gtk+ included with 10.0: gtk+2-2.4.3-i486-1. The
source code was gtk+-2.4.3. Compiled and installed it on the /usr/local
level.
Comparing the installed header files for gdk-pixbuf was a revelation:
wildly different! Looked like someone had added a bunch of stuff to
several header files and even included two *.xh files in the Slackware
package. What is going on here?
Where did Pat Volkerding get his packages? Or did he modify them
himself? I know he doesn't like Gnome, but have never heard anything
about the gtk code. Gtk+-1.2 works just fine, incidentally.
Anyone have a clue about this? My installation is still box stock: all
new stuff is at /usr/local, leaving /usr strictly distro stuff.
I guess the point is that unless this is resolved, I'll not be inclined
to trust Slackware development packages in the future, and that's a Bad
Thing (tm)!
Longfellow
|
Apologies for having cast aspersions on Slackware.
"Some people say a distro's to blame,
But I know:
It's my own damn fault!"
Never, ever, ever install newer versions without removing the older ones
and doing the ldconfig stuff! Guess I've lost all hope of ever
attaining BOZO status... :(
Dumped all the extraneous stuff, replaced the newer versions with the
one's from the CD, did 'ldconfig' and it all "just works". Also
compiles Gtk+-2.0 apps without comment.
A very contrite,
Longfellow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Manyard *nix forums Guru Wannabe
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 233
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:47 am Post subject:
Re: Slackware-10.0 Gtk+-2.0 discrepancies
|
|
|
Longfellow <not@this.address> trolled:
| Quote: | Never, ever, ever install newer versions without removing the
older ones and doing the ldconfig stuff! Guess I've lost all hope
of ever attaining BOZO status...
|
bozo status? Are you ill? Why would you want to be known as a
bozo? Bozos are the people who f*** things up, not fix them.
cordially, as always,
rm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notbob *nix forums Guru
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 356
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:59 am Post subject:
Re: Slackware-10.0 Gtk+-2.0 discrepancies
|
|
|
On 2006-07-18, Realto Margarino <rm@youasked.org> wrote:
| Quote: | bozo status? Are you ill? Why would you want to be known as a
bozo? Bozos are the people who f*** things up, not fix them.
|
Bozo the Clown was a marketing phenomena, eventually evolving into a
$150G business.
nb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Manyard *nix forums Guru Wannabe
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 233
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject:
Re: Slackware-10.0 Gtk+-2.0 discrepancies
|
|
|
notbob <notbob@nothome.com> trolled:
| Quote: | On 2006-07-18, Realto Margarino <rm@youasked.org> wrote:
bozo status? Are you ill? Why would you want to be known as a
bozo? Bozos are the people who f*** things up, not fix them.
Bozo the Clown was a marketing phenomena, eventually evolving into
a $150G business.
|
Maybe so, but in this ng a "bozo" is simply another name for an
idiot.
cordially, as always,
rm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:47 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Guitar Lessons | Loans | Free website & online homepage | Repair Bad Credit | Loans
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Unix/Linux blog |
electronics forum |
medicine forum |
science forum |
|
|
Privacy Policy
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|