| Author |
Message |
Bas van den Dikkenberg
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 31
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject:
vuser not first
|
|
|
When i create a catch all adress in my valias file al mail go tot hat
adres.
But when I send mail to a users that's in the vmap file the mail will go
to catch all adres I think somting wrong in the processing order.
With kind regards,
Bas van den Dikkenberg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Magnus Bäck
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 1366
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:50 pm Post subject:
Re: vuser not first
|
|
|
On Monday, July 17, 2006 at 21:16 CEST,
Bas van den Dikkenberg <bas@giskit.nl> wrote:
| Quote: | When i create a catch all adress in my valias file al mail go tot hat
adres.
|
Yes. Indeed, a catch-all is a catch-all.
| Quote: | But when I send mail to a users that's in the vmap file the mail will
go to catch all adres I think somting wrong in the processing order.
|
It's not obvious what the "vmap file" is, but I assume you're talking
about the virtual_mailbox_maps lookup table. You need identity mappings
in the virtual alias table for all valid addresses in the virtual
mailbox table:
user1@example.com user1@example.com
user2@example.com user2@example.com
...
userN@example.com userN@example.com
This will stop the recursion and make sure that the catch-all in the
virtual alias table isn't reached.
--
Magnus Bäck
magnus@dsek.lth.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bas van den Dikkenberg
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:23 pm Post subject:
RE: vuser not first
|
|
|
You would't say that virtual_mailbox_maps wouldt be check first
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-postfix-users@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-users@postfix.org] Namens Magnus Bäck
Verzonden: maandag 17 juli 2006 21:51
Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
Onderwerp: Re: vuser not first
On Monday, July 17, 2006 at 21:16 CEST,
Bas van den Dikkenberg <bas@giskit.nl> wrote:
| Quote: | When i create a catch all adress in my valias file al mail go tot hat
adres.
|
Yes. Indeed, a catch-all is a catch-all.
| Quote: | But when I send mail to a users that's in the vmap file the mail will
go to catch all adres I think somting wrong in the processing order.
|
It's not obvious what the "vmap file" is, but I assume you're talking
about the virtual_mailbox_maps lookup table. You need identity mappings
in the virtual alias table for all valid addresses in the virtual
mailbox table:
user1@example.com user1@example.com
user2@example.com user2@example.com
...
userN@example.com userN@example.com
This will stop the recursion and make sure that the catch-all in the
virtual alias table isn't reached.
--
Magnus Bäck
magnus@dsek.lth.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Magnus Bäck
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 26 Feb 2005
Posts: 1366
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:01 pm Post subject:
Re: vuser not first
|
|
|
On Monday, July 17, 2006 at 22:23 CEST,
Bas van den Dikkenberg <bas@giskit.nl> wrote:
| Quote: | You would't say that virtual_mailbox_maps wouldt be check first
|
I can't quite parse that sentence, but virtual rewriting takes place
before the virtual mailbox table is examined.
Stop top-posting.
--
Magnus Bäck
magnus@dsek.lth.se |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Apps
»
Postfix
