niXforums Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
·  nixdoc.net ·  man pages ·  Linux HOWTOs ·  FreeBSD Tips ·  Forums
navigation Forum index » *nix » Linux » Distributions » Debian » devel
UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Jon Dowland
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 463

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:10 am    Post subject: UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable Reply with quote

Hello,

I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages
making it into sarge/stable.

We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using
UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a single physical box, and
have been advised that Debian GNU/Linux is a very good OS to use for the
host machine, due to its management tools. We usually use Red Hat for
our systems so there would be a labour cost for us to adopt a different
distribution.

We would need to use the stable branch of Debian for a production
system. However, if the transition from woody to sarge would mean that
there would no longer be UML packages in stable, we would have to use
something else.

From a personal POV, I am a debian user and if debian was the best
choice for our needs, I'd be very happy to see it being used. What kind
of work is needed to get the UML packages sorted out? Is an NMU a
possibility?

--
Jon Dowland
Webteam
University of Newcastle


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Tilman Koschnick
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable Reply with quote

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:42 +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
Quote:
Hello,

I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages
making it into sarge/stable.

We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using
UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a single physical box, and
have been advised that Debian GNU/Linux is a very good OS to use for the
host machine, due to its management tools. We usually use Red Hat for
our systems so there would be a labour cost for us to adopt a different
distribution.

We would need to use the stable branch of Debian for a production
system. However, if the transition from woody to sarge would mean that
there would no longer be UML packages in stable, we would have to use
something else.

From a personal POV, I am a debian user and if debian was the best
choice for our needs, I'd be very happy to see it being used. What kind
of work is needed to get the UML packages sorted out? Is an NMU a
possibility?

There was a thread about co-maintenance of UML a while back:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg01059.html

Cheers, Til


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Matt Zimmerman
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 6:10 am    Post subject: Re: UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable Reply with quote

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:42:13AM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:

Quote:
I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages
making it into sarge/stable.

We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using
UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a single physical box, and
have been advised that Debian GNU/Linux is a very good OS to use for the
host machine, due to its management tools. We usually use Red Hat for
our systems so there would be a labour cost for us to adopt a different
distribution.

We would need to use the stable branch of Debian for a production
system. However, if the transition from woody to sarge would mean that
there would no longer be UML packages in stable, we would have to use
something else.

From a personal POV, I am a debian user and if debian was the best
choice for our needs, I'd be very happy to see it being used. What kind
of work is needed to get the UML packages sorted out? Is an NMU a
possibility?

UML upstream has been chaotic, and I haven't had the resources to keep it in
shape in packaged form. A group of developers recently started an Alioth
project for maintenance of UML-related packages, but I'm not sure where it
stands as far as restoring usable UML packages to unstable.

--
- mdz


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:56 pm | All times are GMT
navigation Forum index » *nix » Linux » Distributions » Debian » devel
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Urgent and imp. Making Squid 2.6 stable as tranpsarent proxy SHERDIL Squid 0 Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:18 am
No new posts Help required for making squid 2.6 stable 2 transparent SHERDIL Squid 0 Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:55 am
No new posts Help required for making squid 2.6 stable 2 transparent SHERDIL Squid 0 Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:52 am
No new posts Sound Configuration problem on clean Sarge install Richard Cookson Debian 0 Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:30 pm
No new posts ftp.debian.org & amd64 packages tanelko Debian 1 Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:10 pm

Loans | eHarmony Coupon | Guitar Lessons | Venta de libro | Mobile Phone
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
 
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Unix/Linux blog |  electronics forum |  medicine forum |  science forum | 
Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1446s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0684s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]