|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Marc Haber
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 646
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:40 pm Post subject:
Why didn't #290810 hold eximdoc4 from sarge?
|
|
|
Hi,
#290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However,
after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge despite of the
bug.
What did we do wrong?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Lichtenheld
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 5:40 pm Post subject:
Re: Why didn't #290810 hold eximdoc4 from sarge?
|
|
|
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
| Quote: | #290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However,
after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge despite of the
bug.
What did we do wrong?
|
You probably did open the bug before the dinstall run that installed
the new package. Therefor britney was confused and thought the bug would
apply to the package in sarge, too (as at the time it saw the bug the
first time the version in sid and sarge were identical). So the package
in sid wasn't more buggy than the one in sarge ...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marc Haber
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 646
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:10 pm Post subject:
Re: Why didn't #290810 hold eximdoc4 from sarge?
|
|
|
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:38:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld
<djpig@debian.org> wrote:
| Quote: | On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
#290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However,
after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge despite of the
bug.
What did we do wrong?
You probably did open the bug before the dinstall run that installed
the new package. Therefor britney was confused and thought the bug would
apply to the package in sarge, too (as at the time it saw the bug the
first time the version in sid and sarge were identical). So the package
in sid wasn't more buggy than the one in sarge ...
|
I see. So we will wait two days before filing the dummy bug on
eximdoc4 next time. Thanks for enlightening.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:09 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Credit Counseling | Magazine Subscriptions | Remortgages | Debt Consolidation | Credit Counseling
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Unix/Linux blog |
electronics forum |
medicine forum |
science forum |
|
|
Privacy Policy
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
*nix
»
Linux
»
Distributions
»
Debian
»
devel
