niXforums Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
·  nixdoc.net ·  man pages ·  Linux HOWTOs ·  FreeBSD Tips ·  Forums
navigation Forum index » *nix » BSD » FreeBSD » mail-lists » Architecture
LDADD+=-lstdc++ vs. LD=
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Mikhail Teterin
*nix forums addict


Joined: 23 Mar 2002
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2002 4:11 pm    Post subject: LDADD+=-lstdc++ vs. LD=${CXX} Reply with quote

Hello!

Which of the two constructs in the subject is better -- more portable,
more reliable, more correct (for some definitions of the adjectives
listed)?

AFAIK, when linking an executable, it is LD=${CXX} (hence the recent
PROG_CXX introduction). But what about linking together a shared C++
library which is supposed to be used in C executables (the relationship
between graphics/libfpx and graphics/ImageMagick)?

Is it time for LIB_CXX define?

Thanks!

-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:49 am | All times are GMT
navigation Forum index » *nix » BSD » FreeBSD » mail-lists » Architecture
Jump to:  


Loans | Soul Calibur III Mp3 | Myspace Generators | Credit Cards | Debt Consolidation
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
 
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Unix/Linux blog |  electronics forum |  medicine forum |  science forum | 
Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1627s ][ Queries: 11 (0.0778s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]