|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
houghi
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 6233
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:40 am Post subject:
Re: 1SUSE-Linux-10.1-GM-Addon-Biarch.iso345160 (001/921)
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.suse.]
jasajoh@\power-post.org (Yenc-Power-Post) wrote:
| Quote: |
=ybegin part=1 line=128 size=353443840 name=SUSE-Linux-10.1-GM-Addon-Biarch.iso
=ypart begin=1 end=384000
snip |
You a*****le fucking nutter. news:alt.os.linux.suse is NOT a binary
newsgroup. Abuse send to your provider.
--
houghi Please do not toppost http://houghi.org
Let's not be too tough on our own ignorance. It's the thing that makes
America great. If America weren't incomparably ignorant, how could we
have tolerated the last eight years? -- Frank Zappa, in 1988 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 723
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:38 am Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
In article <PeQsg.9759$Ep.9545@trnddc08>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In article <lWvsg.5577$F8.2890@trnddc02>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In article <Ekesg.4079$Zf.3827@trnddc04>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes.
To be precise, do you mean 4GB or 4GiB?
Read the rest of my reply.
You didn't seem to understand the difference.
How did you get that impression? The "4GB minus 2 bytes" came from a
Microsoft document. Maybe they don't understand the difference. :-)
Does 2^28 look like decimal? Only the drive makers use 1K = 1000!
Some are getting sued for using a non-computer convention!  Still
many file lengths are given in decimal bytes for checking. Only the
lawyers will win! :-(
As do scientists. Who invented the notation, after all.
I even still have a deci-trig slide rule!
For some reason, GiB never caught on!
Yes it has. It's frequently to be found all over the Linux docs.
For more info, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix>.
NIST tried as early as 1998, but most computers report as in the first
table in the above. Where do you see "GiB" on a computer screen, except
in an article about it?
|
On my OpenSuSE 10.0 system, you will find kiB/kibibytes, MiB/mibibytes
and GiB/gibibytes in man pages such as:
growisofs(1)
mkelf(1)
mknbi(1) (and the rest of the mknbi package)
ps(1)
alloc_hugepages(2)
getrlimit(2)
md(4)
units(7)
mdadm(
mkfs.xfs(
mkswap(
smartctl(8)
In /usr/src/linux/Documentation:
vesafb.txt
ldm.txt
filesystems/ntfs.txt
networking/packet_mmap.txt
In /usr/share/doc/packages, have a look at:
netpbm/README
coreutils/NEWS
yast2-backup/backup_specification.html
Like I said, it's all over the Linux docs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VWWall
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:22 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
| Quote: | In article <lWvsg.5577$F8.2890@trnddc02>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In article <Ekesg.4079$Zf.3827@trnddc04>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes.
To be precise, do you mean 4GB or 4GiB?
Read the rest of my reply.
You didn't seem to understand the difference.
|
How did you get that impression? The "4GB minus 2 bytes" came from a
Microsoft document. Maybe they don't understand the difference.
| Quote: |
Does 2^28 look like decimal? Only the drive makers use 1K = 1000!
|
Some are getting sued for using a non-computer convention! Still
many file lengths are given in decimal bytes for checking. Only the
lawyers will win! 
| Quote: |
As do scientists. Who invented the notation, after all.
|
I even still have a deci-trig slide rule!
| Quote: |
For some reason, GiB never caught on!
Yes it has. It's frequently to be found all over the Linux docs.
For more info, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix>.
|
NIST tried as early as 1998, but most computers report as in the first
table in the above. Where do you see "GiB" on a computer screen, except
in an article about it?
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
If we were all born with four fingers and toes, we'd probably be having
a discussion about octal notation. ;-)
--
Virg Wall, PE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lordy
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:12 am Post subject:
Re: wine errors
|
|
|
On 2006-07-11, Ray Turner <RayTurner@coastline.org> wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:48:02 -0500, Gireesh K. Bhat wrote:
What app was it? Did you check to see if it should work well with wine at
www.winehq.org?
I'm sure it's completely unknown to the winehq folks.
|
Doesnt mean you cant provide a name. Someone else might have the same
app running under wine, but they cant tell you whether or not you're
flogging a dead horse, without the added info..
| Quote: | I just did not know
if the error code would provide a work around to get it up and running....
|
What version of wine? You can try the 0.9.16 build on your mystery app.
Not sure which distro you're using either so you can find it in the
usual places!
Lordy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 723
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:58 am Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
In article <lWvsg.5577$F8.2890@trnddc02>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In article <Ekesg.4079$Zf.3827@trnddc04>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes.
To be precise, do you mean 4GB or 4GiB?
Read the rest of my reply.
|
You didn't seem to understand the difference.
| Quote: | Does 2^28 look like decimal? Only the drive makers use 1K = 1000!
|
As do scientists. Who invented the notation, after all.
| Quote: | For some reason, GiB never caught on!
|
Yes it has. It's frequently to be found all over the Linux docs.
For more info, see <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix>. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VWWall
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
| Quote: | In article <Ekesg.4079$Zf.3827@trnddc04>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes.
To be precise, do you mean 4GB or 4GiB?
|
Read the rest of my reply.
Does 2^28 look like decimal? Only the drive makers use 1K = 1000!
For some reason, GiB never caught on!
--
Virg Wall, PE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
*nix forums Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 723
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:40 am Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
In article <Ekesg.4079$Zf.3827@trnddc04>,
VWWall <vwall@DEADearthlink.net> wrote:
| Quote: | To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes.
|
To be precise, do you mean 4GB or 4GiB? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VWWall
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
Robert wrote:
| Quote: | "Vance Howard" <itsme@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:mb8sg.110674$mF2.76794@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Walter Mautner wrote:
Tony wrote:
Hi,
Downloaded Suse 10.1 dvd iso from
ftp://ftp.linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/.. It appeared to download
normally
but after it completed downloading the dvd iso, the dowonload monitor
continued to show activity but with negative numbers..
You are trying to download a >2G image to a FAT32 partition.
You waste your bandwidth.
He didn't mention the version of windows he was using, or what type of
partition it was. If he is using WindowsXP, it is most likely ntfs. Ntfs
can handle 4gb file sizes.
What's this nonsense? A 4GB on fat32 partition is possible, however 4.1GB
being the limit. NTFS has no file-size limit.
To be precise, the largest possible FAT32 file is 4GB minus 2 bytes. |
The count of data clusters must be between 65526 and 268,435,456. Note
the latter number is 2^28, since FAT32 actually uses only 28 bits.
Using WindowsXP, the largest FAT32 partition you can set up is 32GB.
This is an artificial limitation, imposed by MSFT to promote NTFS.
A BIOS limited to 28 bits will limit drive size to 128GB, regardless of
the file system used.
--
Virg Wall, PE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert
*nix forums Guru Wannabe
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 224
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
"Robert" <robert_NOSPAM@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:yBcsg.21787$ST2.19111@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
| Quote: | being the limit. NTFS has no file-size limit.
|
....one that matters! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert
*nix forums Guru Wannabe
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 224
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:15 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
"Vance Howard" <itsme@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:mb8sg.110674$mF2.76794@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| Quote: | Walter Mautner wrote:
Tony wrote:
Hi,
Downloaded Suse 10.1 dvd iso from
ftp://ftp.linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/.. It appeared to download
normally
but after it completed downloading the dvd iso, the dowonload monitor
continued to show activity but with negative numbers..
You are trying to download a >2G image to a FAT32 partition.
You waste your bandwidth.
He didn't mention the version of windows he was using, or what type of
partition it was. If he is using WindowsXP, it is most likely ntfs. Ntfs
can handle 4gb file sizes.
|
What's this nonsense? A 4GB on fat32 partition is possible, however 4.1GB
being the limit. NTFS has no file-size limit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vance Howard
*nix forums addict
Joined: 18 May 2005
Posts: 72
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
Walter Mautner wrote:
| Quote: | Tony wrote:
Hi,
Downloaded Suse 10.1 dvd iso from
ftp://ftp.linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/.. It appeared to download normally
but after it completed downloading the dvd iso, the dowonload monitor
continued to show activity but with negative numbers..
You are trying to download a >2G image to a FAT32 partition.
You waste your bandwidth.
He didn't mention the version of windows he was using, or what type of |
partition it was. If he is using WindowsXP, it is most likely ntfs. Ntfs
can handle 4gb file sizes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyK
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:05 am Post subject:
Re: firefox download monitor showing decreasing negative file size and downlod speed
|
|
|
Michael Soibelman wrote:
| Quote: | Tony wrote:
Hi,
Downloaded Suse 10.1 dvd iso from
ftp://ftp.linux.nssl.noaa.gov/opensuse/.. It appeared to download normally
but after it completed downloading the dvd iso, the dowonload monitor
continued to show activity but with negative numbers..
Window shows:
"SUSE-Linux-10.1-GM-DVD-i386.iso
Pause -847xxxx KB of 2097.2 MB at 33.6KB/sec; 0-25:0-36:0-43 remain"
The -847xxxx ic decrementing and the numbers after ; is incrementing..
Does any know wa\hat is happenning? Any info is appreciated.
Many thank in advance..
Tont Kobatake
Just a guess but the download monitor 'estimates' the total time at the
beginning of the download. Of course, the internet is not steady. Just
click on knemo and open the traffic plotter to see that. So, when the
total time surpasses the estimated time you will get negative numbers.
On the other hand...maybe they decided you shouldn't have the dvd and
they're taking it back ??? LOL
|
The dvd is in the directory I downloaded it into so they did allow me to
have it..  I sense that you have this version installed and hope
you can share your thoughts on how you like it as a workstation...
Currently using Mandrake 2005 then installed mandriva 2006 but seem to
like the previous version better so thought would give Suse a try..
many thanks for your response..
Tony |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kyle.spano1966@yahoo.com
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject:
Re: Linux is More than Ready For Professional Audio. Here is Proof!
|
|
|
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=xFvp2hoAAAAb4mOWpyzVaW0aq-bp9NGnjj6y1UsWUZHxqbrtGgkPow&hl=en
You've gotta be kidding? You post 1800+ messages in May 2006, 1800+
messages in June and you've already got 49 messages in July and the
month is only a couple of hours old, and you are calling that other guy
a troll?
Seems to me that you, Roy Schestowitz are either a uber-troll or you
have a psychological problem that makes you post that many messages to
Usenet.
Or maybe it's both.
Get a life already, or at least go and see a shrink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joel
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject:
Re: news 29.06.2006 13:37 ,The City of Munich praises Linux at the workplace
|
|
|
Mark Kent wrote:
| Quote: |
Umm, don't even know why I responded - I usually ignore anything
x-posted anyway...
|
First Poser, now Culley.
You really are a world-class slurper, Kent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark Kent
*nix forums beginner
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:14 pm Post subject:
Re: news 29.06.2006 13:37 ,The City of Munich praises Linux at the workplace
|
|
|
begin oe_protect.scr
rgc@nodomain.none () <rgc@nodomain.none> espoused:
| Quote: | begin risky.vbs
<1401434.kMSgu24PYi@schestowitz.com>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> writes:
__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Thursday 29 June 2006 19:02 \__
Yes, they spotted the standard lock-in model, which almost
invariably includes a "too good to be true" deal to get you locked
in (or keep you there). Not stupid, those Germans.
Please do not feed the nymshifting flatfish (or trolls). It's only
begging for more.
The following posts from the same nym confirm it is flashfish:
,----[ Quote ]
| BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you fuckwit pillock retard.
`----
You can't take 'Joel' seriously, can you?
,----[ Quote ]
| They could attempt to calculate the number of lies told by Roy
| Culley, Roy "The Liar" Shysterwich, Rex Balltard, Mark Kent, and
| Jimmy Moore.
`----
No other anaonymous troll or errand reader would know some of these
full names and background, preceding posts.
Time to change nyms, Gary. ALso change your underwear. I can smell
you you from here, all the way across the Atlantic.
Yup, another pointer to it being s/h/it is Organization: Aioe.org NNTP
Server. Mark got suckered this time as he doesn't normally feed
attention seeking trolls.
|
Umm, don't even know why I responded - I usually ignore anything
x-posted anyway...
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!"
-- Monty Python and the Holy Grail |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:23 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Debt Management | Free Advertising | Loans | Credit Card Consolidation | Gas Suppliers
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Unix/Linux blog |
electronics forum |
medicine forum |
science forum |
|
|
Privacy Policy
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
*nix
»
Linux
»
Distributions
»
Suse
