|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Rob Verschoor *nix forums addict
Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:46 pm Post subject:
Re: Sybase <-> Oracle Replication
|
|
|
Given the reuqirements you listed, I'd recommend using Sybase Replication
Server.
HTH,
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Verschoor
Certified Sybase Professional DBA for ASE 12.5/12.0/11.5/11.0
and Replication Server 12.5 / TeamSybase
Author of Sybase books (order online at www.sypron.nl/shop):
"Tips, Tricks & Recipes for Sybase ASE"
"The Complete Sybase Replication Server Quick Reference Guide"
"The Complete Sybase ASE Quick Reference Guide"
mailto:rob@YOUR.SPAM.sypron.nl.NOT.FOR.ME
http://www.sypron.nl
Sypron B.V., P.O.Box 10695, 2501HR Den Haag, The Netherlands
-------------------------------------------------------------
"Alex" <avilner@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1112845856.905291.95000@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | Dear netters,
We are in the process of migrating some of our applications from Sybase
(12.5) to Oracle (10g), and are looking for a transitional plan for
keeping the systems running in parallel.
Specifically, we plan on having 3 database servers (simplified
scenario) as follows:
Server #1 (Sybase) - main databases
Server #2 (Sybase) - supplemental databases
Server #3 (Oracle) - migrated main databases (mostly, replica of #1)
Sybase is runing on Solaris, Oracle will be running on AIX.
In our current environment, we need to maintain the following data
movements:
Server #1 -> Server #3 (one way).
This one is for when both servers go live and we begin migrating
applications to be consumers of data in Oracle, rather than Sybase.
Existing applications will continue working with Sybase until they are
migrated, and data is also populated on the Sybase server through a
number of data feeds. For the time being, Oracle Server #3 will be a
read-only database, that needs to be updated on a regular basis, in
near real-time (up to 1 hour delay is acceptable). Anticipated volume
is several million rows of data per day, more during peak times, but
otherwise -- spread throughout the day. Data structures between Sybase
#1 and Oracle #3 will be fairly similar after the migration.
Server #1 <-> Server #2 (two way).
In addition to getting external feeds, server #1 will also be receiving
data from Server #2. The volume of data is not large -- data on Server
#2 is modified either through some batch processing (up to 100,000 rows
per day) or via manual data entry (mostly, corrections, etc., up to
about 10,000 rows per day). The data movement also allows for some
latency, up to 1 hour is acceptable.
Data structures are different between Server #1 and Server #2, some
massaging/transformation is required.
We are looking to implement some sort of replication to fit both of
these requirements. For options we are looking at:
- Sybase Replication Server + DirectConnect to Oracle
- Informatica
- bcp out/bcp in or bcp out/sql loadr in
- Oracle Transparent Gateway
- Others???
In either case, replication will be for changes made since last
replication was run. There may be additional conditions imposed on what
gets replicated, further limiting the amount of data to be replicated.
A complete refresh of data is not an option, due to large overall
volume of data stored in all databases.
What are the recommendations? Do you know if anybody has evaluated
these (and other) options for pros/cons -- as far as ease of
implementation, cost, database changes' requirements, additional
hardware requirements, etc.?
Thank you in advance!
--Alex
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex *nix forums Guru Wannabe
Joined: 22 May 2002
Posts: 290
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:50 am Post subject:
Sybase <-> Oracle Replication
|
|
|
Dear netters,
We are in the process of migrating some of our applications from Sybase
(12.5) to Oracle (10g), and are looking for a transitional plan for
keeping the systems running in parallel.
Specifically, we plan on having 3 database servers (simplified
scenario) as follows:
Server #1 (Sybase) - main databases
Server #2 (Sybase) - supplemental databases
Server #3 (Oracle) - migrated main databases (mostly, replica of #1)
Sybase is runing on Solaris, Oracle will be running on AIX.
In our current environment, we need to maintain the following data
movements:
Server #1 -> Server #3 (one way).
This one is for when both servers go live and we begin migrating
applications to be consumers of data in Oracle, rather than Sybase.
Existing applications will continue working with Sybase until they are
migrated, and data is also populated on the Sybase server through a
number of data feeds. For the time being, Oracle Server #3 will be a
read-only database, that needs to be updated on a regular basis, in
near real-time (up to 1 hour delay is acceptable). Anticipated volume
is several million rows of data per day, more during peak times, but
otherwise -- spread throughout the day. Data structures between Sybase
#1 and Oracle #3 will be fairly similar after the migration.
Server #1 <-> Server #2 (two way).
In addition to getting external feeds, server #1 will also be receiving
data from Server #2. The volume of data is not large -- data on Server
#2 is modified either through some batch processing (up to 100,000 rows
per day) or via manual data entry (mostly, corrections, etc., up to
about 10,000 rows per day). The data movement also allows for some
latency, up to 1 hour is acceptable.
Data structures are different between Server #1 and Server #2, some
massaging/transformation is required.
We are looking to implement some sort of replication to fit both of
these requirements. For options we are looking at:
- Sybase Replication Server + DirectConnect to Oracle
- Informatica
- bcp out/bcp in or bcp out/sql loadr in
- Oracle Transparent Gateway
- Others???
In either case, replication will be for changes made since last
replication was run. There may be additional conditions imposed on what
gets replicated, further limiting the amount of data to be replicated.
A complete refresh of data is not an option, due to large overall
volume of data stored in all databases.
What are the recommendations? Do you know if anybody has evaluated
these (and other) options for pros/cons -- as far as ease of
implementation, cost, database changes' requirements, additional
hardware requirements, etc.?
Thank you in advance!
--Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:33 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Debt Consolidation | Debt Consolidation | Watch Anime Online | Charity Gifts | Guitar Lesson
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Unix/Linux blog |
electronics forum |
medicine forum |
science forum |
|
|
Privacy Policy
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|