niXforums Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
·  nixdoc.net ·  man pages ·  Linux HOWTOs ·  FreeBSD Tips ·  Forums
navigation Forum index » *nix » SGI/IRIX » hardware
Dead Fuel
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 6 [79 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
Sheldon T. Hall - DO NOT
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:05 am    Post subject: Re: Onyx IO4 board versions and processor upgrades Reply with quote

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:06:51 -0000, "mr mystery"
<itsa.secret@im.not.telling.you> wrote:

Quote:
Hello

I have a deskside Onyx RE2 system with two 200Mhz R4400 processors. I have
the opportunity to upgrade it to four 195Mhz R10K processors. Do I need to
change the IO4 board as well? The part no. of mine is 030-0646-104. I have
seen two systems online which have R10k processors and different versions of
the IO4 board : one at
http://www.gisparks.tas.gov.au/sgi/onyxchallengepartslist.html where the IO4
part number is 030-0646-107, and the other at
http://hardware.majix.org/computers/sgi.onyx/onyx.shtml where the part
number is 030-0646-106. Just to confuse things even more, the part number in
system that my processor board will be coming out of is 030-0646-105!

The parts list on Simon Pigots website says that the only IO4 board which
supports R10K processors is the one where the part number ends in 107. But
this can't be right if the other two Onyxs work with different versions of
the IO4 board.

I have been running a -104 IO4 board in a Challenge L with an IP25
board for some years. Works fine. However, a -105 IO4 board in the
same machine does not work.

For googling ... 030-0646-104, 030-0646-105, 030-0646-106,
030-0646-107.

-Shel
Back to top
uptime
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:31 am    Post subject: Re: Pinout for Older Dialbox/Buttons Cable Reply with quote

Hi,

I did a quick google search: it looks like you own the original SGI
buttons (SN-911) and the original SGI dials (should be SN-921, with the
huge 5V power adapter).

In this case the pinout is different:

Signal Dial Box: male DB9 <--> Indigo2: female MiniDIN8
============================================
TD 2 3
RD 3 5
SG 7 4 or 8

I suppose its the same for the Buttons (SN-911).

Good luck.
Back to top
uptime
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:04 am    Post subject: Re: Pinout for Older Dialbox/Buttons Cable Reply with quote

Hi Adam,

back in 1998 I documented the pinouts for the

o SGI Dial Box SN-921 (No Buttons)
o SGI Dials & Buttons (dials controller 013-0214-001, buttons
013-0251-001)

on O2, Octane (male DB9) and Indigo, Indigo2, Indy (female MiniDIN8).

I suppose you want to connect the D&B to an Indigo2? So this would be

Signal D&B: female DB9 <--> Indigo2: female MiniDIN8
============================================
TD 1 3
RD 2 5
SG 6 4 or 8

I am not sure about IRIX 6.5, but with 6.3 you need eoe.sw.optinput.
Install as 'Dials & Buttons'.
If unsure about the serial interface, consult your local man page
serial(7).

As you can see, a standard serial cable wouldn't work.

Please report back whether this works.

Al
Back to top
Adam Smith
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Pinout for Older Dialbox/Buttons Cable Reply with quote

Thanks Thomas,

Don't see an explicit P/N

On the button box
Model #SN-911
Type # 9780805
Serial # 05A4712C

Nothing on the Dial box, unless internal

Adam


Thomas Jahns wrote:
Quote:
Adam Smith <adamsmith@econ.com> writes:

Does any one have the cables or know what is the pinout on the old
cables [i.e old dials on Indigo2], DB9F to DB9F, interfacing the
buttons/dialbox to the serial adapter hanging off the CPU.


Different versions have different cables IIRC. Could you please post the
SGI part number of the button box/dials you have in mind?

Thomas Jahns
Back to top
Wim Cossement
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 173

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Pinout for Older Dialbox/Buttons Cable Reply with quote

Thomas Jahns wrote:
Quote:
Adam Smith <adamsmith@econ.com> writes:

Does any one have the cables or know what is the pinout on the old
cables [i.e old dials on Indigo2], DB9F to DB9F, interfacing the
buttons/dialbox to the serial adapter hanging off the CPU.


Different versions have different cables IIRC. Could you please post the
SGI part number of the button box/dials you have in mind?

Thomas Jahns

Mine does not have any partnumber on it, so...

Wim
Back to top
Moss Margret
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:01 am    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C61A1F.30589D60
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0011_01C61A1F.30589D60"


------=_NextPart_001_0011_01C61A1F.30589D60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Champion
Prince
------=_NextPart_001_0011_01C61A1F.30589D60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DWindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A =
Back to top
markbire23
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:11 pm    Post subject: RE: Product brochures Reply with quote

My name is Mark Brennan, I am a systems engineer with Fujitsu in
Ireland and I have a request I am looking for some help with.

My request is some what strange to say the least.

Since I joined Wang Computer in 1988 I have been collecting Product
Brochures on various computer systems it started of with Wang Vs server
systems.

For the last few years I have been trying to collect old
product/info/fact/marketing brochures on various computer systems with
very little luck, as in the future I hope to set-up a web site with
details and overviews of them. I have managed to collect some
information on,
DG/HP/Wang/Netframe/NCR/Tandem/DEC/Sequent/SGI/Siemens-Fujitsu/Pyramid/Apollo/Cray/KSR/Ncube/ICL/Compaq
etc, I was wondering whether or not you may have or know where I maybe
able to get my hands on any old product brochures/fact sheets etc on
any of the SGI systems/servers, I know that my request is at best
strange but any help would be great.



Regard and thanks again markb.
Back to top
John-Paul Stewart
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 497

PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Tezro pricing Reply with quote

thegoldbug wrote:
Quote:
mr_peter_stevenson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118612083.574047.129810@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

I'd be happy with a secondhand Fuel...



http://www.sgi.com/products/remarketed/weekly_specials.html

SGI is listing two Tezro's and a Fuel system. Very pricey but hey that's
SGI.

There's a couple of Fuels listed on this page, too:

http://www.get.com/specials.html
Back to top
thegoldbug
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:31 am    Post subject: Re: Tezro pricing Reply with quote

<mr_peter_stevenson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118612083.574047.129810@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
I'd be happy with a secondhand Fuel...


http://www.sgi.com/products/remarketed/weekly_specials.html

SGI is listing two Tezro's and a Fuel system. Very pricey but hey that's
SGI.

thegoldbug
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Tezro pricing Reply with quote

I'd be happy with a secondhand Fuel...
Back to top
chrisv
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 124

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:35 pm    Post subject: Re: ATI persues future Xbox contracts Reply with quote

<AGM-65> wrote:

Crossposting a$$hole.

X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net

Done.
Back to top
Steve
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 600

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Miranda Vivo Reply with quote

On 2005-04-06 22:31:46 +0100, "S.Chang" <shu.chang@mapson.ieee.org> said:

Quote:
Khalid Schofield wrote:
this sounds interesting. Digital video on the O2 is always nice :)

what sorts of devices could I hook up to this interface?

The Analog jacks on the O2 are getting less and less used on my O2 as I'm
moving towards digital sources.


CCIR 601 serial digital video I/O with *BNC* connectors.
I was quoted 750 pounds + VAT for one.

I have one of these in my bits box!

Is it any use?

I was looking for a solution to get TV off my UK Sky+ PVR via scart,
could I use this with a second user O2 or maybe Octane? Or even Indigo2
Solid Impact - the only SGI I still have....

There are easier ways I know but Steve's mind works in mysterious ways!

Steve

PS I still have the O2 A/V unit and camera too.
Back to top
Philippe C.D. Robert
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am    Post subject: Re: V12 and antialiasing Reply with quote

gm wrote:
Quote:
It's possible that some kind of blending is available on the Octane2
V12, but the V12 does not have multisampling hardware. And our
application uses Performer for most of the rendering. Both our V12 and
Performer ignored all attempts to enable multisampling using FSAA
settings, and SGI confirmed that this was because the V12 has no
multisampling hardware capability. They also confirmed that for our
application, no real-time full-scene anti-aliasing was possible with
Performer on the V12.


Uhm ... I was talking about OpenGL Multipipe SDK (MPK) and *not*
Performer! This is a different API. MPK does FSAA on its own, using HW
acceleration, if available.

------------ And now a word from our sponsor ------------------
Do your users want the best web-email gateway? Don't let your
customers drift off to free webmail services install your own
web gateway!
-- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_webmail.htm ----
Back to top
zolo
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 6:09 pm    Post subject: Re: V12 and antialiasing Reply with quote

gm wrote:
Quote:
It's possible that some kind of blending is available on the Octane2
V12, but the V12 does not have multisampling hardware. And our
application uses Performer for most of the rendering. Both our V12 and
Performer ignored all attempts to enable multisampling using FSAA
settings, and SGI confirmed that this was because the V12 has no
multisampling hardware capability. They also confirmed that for our
application, no real-time full-scene anti-aliasing was possible with
Performer on the V12.



Given this fact, what benefits are there to using the
hardware vs. software accumulation buffer setting on V12?

-zolo
Back to top
gm
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 11:27 pm    Post subject: Re: V12 and antialiasing Reply with quote

It's possible that some kind of blending is available on the Octane2
V12, but the V12 does not have multisampling hardware. And our
application uses Performer for most of the rendering. Both our V12 and
Performer ignored all attempts to enable multisampling using FSAA
settings, and SGI confirmed that this was because the V12 has no
multisampling hardware capability. They also confirmed that for our
application, no real-time full-scene anti-aliasing was possible with
Performer on the V12.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 6 [79 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:09 am | All times are GMT
navigation Forum index » *nix » SGI/IRIX » hardware
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Dead parallel port (/dev messup) kaczfan hardware 4 Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:10 pm
No new posts Reactivating a dead hard drive Didier Godefroy Tru64 managers mail-list 1 Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:53 am
No new posts Is OpenFTS dead? howa PostgreSQL 3 Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:57 pm
No new posts Win32::SerialPort dead in 5.8? aaron.propst@gmail.com Perl 3 Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:19 pm
No new posts OT: Ken Lay dead JF Mezei VMS 20 Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:08 am

Sony VAIO Laptop | Auto Loans | Mobile Phones | Loans | Gas Suppliers
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
 
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Unix/Linux blog |  electronics forum |  medicine forum |  science forum | 
Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.6194s ][ Queries: 16 (0.4629s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]