niXforums Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
·  nixdoc.net ·  man pages ·  Linux HOWTOs ·  FreeBSD Tips ·  Forums
navigation Forum index » *nix » Solaris » x86
Driver for Gigabit PCI-LAN8169S
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 46 of 48 [708 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, ..., 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 Next
Author Message
gerryt@vcn.bc.ca
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Sun (lack of) support for Ultra 20 Reply with quote

Reginald Beardsley wrote:
Quote:
John D Groenveld wrote:
Just got finished installing Solaris on a Gateway (via BestBuy)
MX7118 laptop.
What sort of disk I/O performance do you see? I've been interested in a
similar laptop, but afraid of getting another system which is stuck in
PIO 4 mode.
Who just informed by Sun that his new Ultra 20 *won't* work w/ 4 GB of
memory Sad

Which is seemingly wrong according to Sunsolve :
"4 GB PC3200 Maximum, installed in identically matched pairs"
So what is the scoop? Seems like the "individual" who told you that
should not be speaking for Sun...
Back to top
Reginald Beardsley
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:03 am    Post subject: Re: Sun (lack of) support for Ultra 20 Reply with quote

gerryt@ wrote:
Quote:
Reginald Beardsley wrote:

John D Groenveld wrote:

Just got finished installing Solaris on a Gateway (via BestBuy)
MX7118 laptop.

What sort of disk I/O performance do you see? I've been interested in a
similar laptop, but afraid of getting another system which is stuck in
PIO 4 mode.
Who just informed by Sun that his new Ultra 20 *won't* work w/ 4 GB of
memory :-(


Which is seemingly wrong according to Sunsolve :
"4 GB PC3200 Maximum, installed in identically matched pairs"
So what is the scoop? Seems like the "individual" who told you that
should not be speaking for Sun...


Here's an excerpt from the email from Sun support:

Quote:
System Fails to power up (Port 80 displays FF and shuts down) with 4GB
memory config

Intermittent loading issue with 4GB of memory and rapid power on of
system causing Under Voltage protection.
Workaround:
Turn off the power switch on the PSU and re-apply power.

Workaround:
Physically remove 2 DIMMs from the system.

It also won't work w/ just the two 3rd party DIMMS installed, so I'm
still trying to find out if there's an issue w/ the DIMMS (Patriot
brand) or if that's also related to the power issue.
Back to top
Bill Gunshannon
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 1019

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Solaris Needs a Mascot!! Reply with quote

In article <NuKVf.14609$uX5.3736@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
Logan Shaw <lshaw-usenet@austin.rr.com> writes:
Quote:
Markus Gyger wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
Guess why I did propose an orca a year ago ;-)

Well, I'd prefer OpenSolaris not to be something
that feeds off of others either...

OK, how about the fish then? Why? Because it scales... ;-)

Seriously though, how about a giant tortoise, then? It's herbivorous,
and they live for well over 100 years sometimes (the record being
close to 200 years, or maybe even over 250 years, depending on who
you believe), symbolizing stability.


And amazingly slow.... Hmmm.... Might not be such a good idea. :-)

bill

--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill@cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
Back to top
Casper H.S. Dik
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1634

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Solaris Needs a Mascot!! Reply with quote

bill@cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon) writes:

Quote:
In article <NuKVf.14609$uX5.3736@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
Logan Shaw <lshaw-usenet@austin.rr.com> writes:
Markus Gyger wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
Guess why I did propose an orca a year ago ;-)

Well, I'd prefer OpenSolaris not to be something
that feeds off of others either...

OK, how about the fish then? Why? Because it scales... ;-)

Seriously though, how about a giant tortoise, then? It's herbivorous,
and they live for well over 100 years sometimes (the record being
close to 200 years, or maybe even over 250 years, depending on who
you believe), symbolizing stability.


And amazingly slow.... Hmmm.... Might not be such a good idea. Smile

Might still outrun a penguin :-)

Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
Back to top
Michael Laajanen
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Solaris Needs a Mascot!! Reply with quote

HI,


Rick Jones wrote:
Quote:
In alt.solaris.x86 santiago538@yahoo.com <santiago538@yahoo.com> wrote:

If Linux has Tux, I suggest a Leopard Seal for Solaris. (-;


FWIW,

Penguins are social creatures, Leopard Seals are loners and may even
prey on others of their kind:

http://www.yptenc.org.uk/docs/factsheets/animal_facts/leopardseal.html
http://ladywildlife.com/animal/leopardseal.html

Don't forget there is almost always something else higher in the food
chain. In this case, which OS would have the Orca as a Mascot?-)
ORCA was actually a FPGA family from Lucent, I still have the cup Smile


/michael
Back to top
Chris Thompson
*nix forums addict


Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Solaris Needs a Mascot!! Reply with quote

In article <sAKVf.4065$AC2.33@fe09.lga>, Paul Gress <pgress@pb.net> wrote:
Quote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
Markus Gyger wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
Guess why I did propose an orca a year ago ;-)

Well, I'd prefer OpenSolaris not to be something
that feeds off of others either...

OK, how about the fish then? Why? Because it scales... ;-)

Seriously though, how about a giant tortoise, then? It's herbivorous,
and they live for well over 100 years sometimes (the record being
close to 200 years, or maybe even over 250 years, depending on who
you believe), symbolizing stability.

- Logan

Well the tortoise is slow, a Polar Bear sounds better, lives up there in
the cold weather with Penguins, is strong and can't be stopped once going.

Actually lives about as far away from penguins as it is possible to get,
which sounds quite appropriate.

But polar bears are also notorious for their highly poisonous livers,
are they not? What part of Solaris does this correspond to?

--
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 [at] cam.ac.uk
Back to top
gerryt@vcn.bc.ca
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:45 am    Post subject: Re: Best Layout Reply with quote

ehabaziz2001@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
I need your best advice of best layout for future packages
installation [my hard 160GB] holding (Sol10/intel)
Sol 10 recognize HD as followed :
/ : 9509
/swap : 594
overlap: 152613
/export/home: 142498
I need to expand /var for future installations?
Please advice the best

There is no 'best layout'. Unless you have something special in mind.
live upgrades zones software RAID etc. theres lots of examples where
a single root partition and swap would be limiting. BUT you can always
add disks later and create mount points to suit. In your case one
root and a swap partition should be sufficient.
Back to top
Lion-O
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 346

PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:59 pm    Post subject: Re: not entry for man pages ? Reply with quote

Quote:
#man ls
no entry for ls ?

Try also:

sparrow /downloads % pkginfo | grep SUNWman
system SUNWman On-Line Manual Pages

But that doesn't proof anything ;-)

This does:

magi:/usr/share/man/man1 $ pkgchk -lp `pwd`/ls.1
NOTE: Couldn't lock the package database.
Pathname: /usr/share/man/man1/ls.1
Type: regular file
Expected mode: 0644
Expected owner: root
Expected group: root
Expected file size (bytes): 21087
Expected sum(1) of contents: 19990
Expected last modification: Dec 22 22:40:55 2004
Referenced by the following packages:
SUNWman
Current status: installed


(Sorry, couldn't resist Wink)

--
Groetjes, Peter

..\\ PGP/GPG key: http://www.catslair.org/pubkey.asc
Back to top
gerryt@vcn.bc.ca
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Anybody Put Firebird on Solaris? Reply with quote

Dave (from the UK) wrote:
Quote:
Larry Lindstrom wrote:
I want to install the Firebird database server on a
Solaris 10 PC. Reading the docs makes me think the
Firebird team doesn't invest much effort on our favorite
platform.
Has anybody done this? Any hints?

Well, looking at their home page I see a Solaris x86 pre-built
package...

I pulled down the source as there is no SPARC port,
but its missing some key bits that perhaps
I may not have (typical GNU latest and greatest version of something
missing probably). I could build the configure script but it fails part
way
through...
"configure: error: cannot run /bin/bash
builds/make.new/config/config.sub"
Perhaps a CVS download might work..

Quote:
Does it need to be Firebird? MySQL works well if you just need a database.

I agree - whats "Firebird sourceforge version alpha beta 000.1" got
over PostgreSQL 8.1 ..
Back to top
Doug Freyburger
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Bad sectors detectors ? Reply with quote

ehabaziz2001@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:

How can I detect the bad scetors for Solaris 10 ? Mark and idetify bad
sctors ?

You know the process has been automated on SCSI drives
since the early 1980s, right? So there's no need whatsoever
to do so.

Just checking to see if your next question is about defrag,
which is the exact same type of comment.

Use format and explore the menus a bit. You'll discover that
you can display the known bad sectors on a drive. Even
though the data is automated, displaying it is not without
merit. The bad spots that are not full sectors are spots
found at the factory. The bad spots that are full sectors are
the ones discovered since purchase. The rate spots go bad
does tell about the aging of the drive. If the rate goes up
enough the automated bad sector redirection eventually
fails. You'll occasionally want to look at the table to see if
that's happening. Every 2-3 years will be fine.
Back to top
Colin B.
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 344

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Manual layout of Sol10 Reply with quote

In comp.unix.solaris Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88@comcast.net> wrote:
Quote:
Colin B. wrote:
In comp.unix.solaris ehabaziz2001@gmail.com wrote:

Let say for Oracle application ?


And what is your hardware?

When you say "Oracle Application," do you mean a database-backed application,
or Oracle itself (which would make this a database box)?

There's no way I would put a database on an OS disk in anything other than
a playground for myself. Also, Oracle makes some very strict demands on what
is required for swap space, so my thought would be:

/ s0 20GB
swap> s1 Whatever Oracle recommends
overlap s2 (whole disk)
/var s3 10GB
metadb s7 >24MB (massive overkill)

...and if home directories are going to be on the local disk,
/export/home s4 (remaining disk less 20GB)

Then put Oracle on an external disk.


Shouldn't the Oracle executables be put in /opt?

Depends on the particulars of the site. Our Oracle binaries are in their
own directory, but on local disk at any rate.

Quote:
The database itself should normally be spread over five or more
spindles. Don't put both a table and its indices on the same drive and
put redo logs on a disk by themselves.

Oracle makes some very specific recommendations for allocating disk
space. If you need to ask, find those recommendations and obey them as
if they were holy writ! You can break the rules if the data base is
small, simple, and performance is not terribly important but, if that is
the case, why are you using Oracle?

Agreed. There are certain situations where breaking the rules makes clear
sense, but you REALLY need to know what you're doing, if you don't want to
mess things up.
Back to top
Carsten R. Jakobsen
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Solaris 10 on PIII .9 MH Reply with quote

Hi,

I have recently installed Solaris 10 on the following hardware:
Intel Pentium II 350 MHZ, 458 MB (during solaris10 install only 192 MB),
56xCDROM, 8Gb harddisk.
Boot time from boot-prompt to dt-login 2 minutes
Login time another minute. I am using Java Desktop running Mozilla and
Staroffice and e-mail and it is working ok.
First time applications start, it may take a litle while, but overall the
system is ok responsive.
It is an ok typewriter Smile
My installation experience includes:
1) I installed using Solaris CDROM. Problem with mount of CDROM 2-4 because
by default the smservice is not started by svcadm .Fix: Root# svcadm -v
enable smserver
2) Network configuration. For some reasons Solaris installer was unable to
see my ISP's DNS servers.
Fix: Install with networking=None. After added two "nameserver
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" entries to resolv.conf and moved nsswitch.dns to
nsswitch.conf
/Carsten
<ehabaziz2001@gmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:1143110278.510701.259700@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Can solaris 10 installed on Solaris 10 on PIII .9 MH 256 RAM ?
Back to top
ehabaziz2001@gmail.com
*nix forums addict


Joined: 25 Aug 2005
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:25 pm    Post subject: Re: X windows from Sun Reply with quote

Is there solution to that problem ?
Back to top
Dave (from the UK)
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 464

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:38 pm    Post subject: Re: X windows from Sun Reply with quote

ehabaziz2001@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Is there solution to that problem ?

If you quoted part of the post, we might know what problem you are talking

about, without looking back at all the posts on the subject and guessing what
problem you are talking about.

--
Dave K MCSE.

MCSE = Minefield Consultant and Solitaire Expert.

Please note my email address changes periodically to avoid spam.
It is always of the form: month-year@domain. Hitting reply will work
for a couple of months only. Later set it manually.
Back to top
Ian
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 1615

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:40 pm    Post subject: Re: X windows from Sun Reply with quote

ehabaziz2001@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Is there solution to that problem ?

Which problem?


--
Ian Collins.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 46 of 48 [708 Posts] Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, ..., 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:41 am | All times are GMT
navigation Forum index » *nix » Solaris » x86
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Slow Connectivity via Gigabit Doug V networking 6 Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:16 pm
No new posts Correct use of OCI driver proxy authentication with WebSp... eugene_boulis@hotmail.com Oracle 0 Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:35 pm
No new posts CUPS for Tru64 and printer driver for Toshiba eSTUDIO351c A. Mahendra Rajah Tru64 managers mail-list 0 Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:12 pm
No new posts x freeze with ATI driver and openoffice. wehn Debian 1 Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:30 pm
No new posts sd Driver problem r.a.reissaus@risdi.com Suse 1 Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:38 pm

Mortgage | Blog5 Game Cheats | Hypnosis | Web Advertising | Loans
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
 
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Unix/Linux blog |  electronics forum |  medicine forum |  science forum | 
Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 1.7598s ][ Queries: 16 (1.6304s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]