niXforums Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
·  nixdoc.net ·  man pages ·  Linux HOWTOs ·  FreeBSD Tips ·  Forums
navigation Forum index » *nix » Linux » Setup
how to install dual linux
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 30 [441 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2, 3, ..., 28, 29, 30 Next
Author Message
Douglas Mayne
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 378

PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:54 am    Post subject: Re: Modem Problem with Suse Version 10.1 Reply with quote

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:38:05 -0500, Clois Beckwith wrote:
<CUT>
Quote:
"Douglas Mayne" <doug@localhost.localnet> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.20.14.51.43.977337@localhost.localnet...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:54:36 -0500, Clois Beckwith wrote:

snip

Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem #1
07-17-2006 21:33:05.921 - File: C:\WINDOWS\system32\tapisrv.dll, Version
5.1.2600
snip
AT+GMM - Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem
H.324 video-ready rev. 1.0
snip
ATI4 - 537EP Release 4.58.1 - Nov 20 2003 - 22:00:59
ATI5 - CP Code Location: Host PC
DSP Code Location: Host PC
Host Interface: PCI
ATI6 - DSP Software Version : 2.15.25.0
ATI7 - OK

snip

It looks like you have an Intel chipset modem and Lucent chipset modem. I
think have used modems using those chipsets with GNU/Linux, but not using
the Windows drivers (as it appears you are attempting to do.) I compiled
the kernel driver. I like using the native driver, but I realize
compiling anything can be intimidating to some users. This post explains
what I did for the Intel modem.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.hardware/msg/e21cbc96c1d6cf85

The updated source for the drive is here (oops, split url below):

http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/T8Clearance.aspx?
url=/9266/eng/Intel-536EP-4.71.tgz&agr=Y&ProductID=977&DwnldID=9266&lang=eng

Check www.linmodems.org for the status of your Lucent chipset modem.

If you don't want to compile the driver, then the best advice may
be for you to get an external modem. They usually work "out of the box."
PASTE
I don't have the slightest idea how to do this.!!! But I will read your
information and see if I can do this. Be back in touch......

Please don't top post. I have moved your response to follow the format

adopted by this newsgroup.

I noticed after I posted that you are using a Intel-537EP. There is a
separate source/driver for that chipset. My links refer to Intel-536EP,
and that is the wrong driver. It appears version 2.7.95.0 is the latest
driver for the 537EP:

(split url, again:)
http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/T8Clearance.aspx?
url=/9284/eng/Intel-537EP-2.70.95.0-suse9.3.tgz&agr=Y&ProductID=1230&DwnldID=9284&lang=eng

You said you have tried two versions of Suse. I see that Intel
supports Suse version 9.3 directly with a binary driver. Suse 9.3 is a
little old, though. The source is the best way, but you'll need to be
able to follow their instructions carefully.

--
Douglas Mayne
Back to top
Clois Beckwith
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 1:38 am    Post subject: Re: Modem Problem with Suse Version 10.1 Reply with quote

I don't have the slightest idea how to do this.!!! But I will read your
information and see if I can do this. Be back in touch......

"Douglas Mayne" <doug@localhost.localnet> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.20.14.51.43.977337@localhost.localnet...
Quote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:54:36 -0500, Clois Beckwith wrote:

Can someone look at these two modem queries, neither one works under 10.1
Suse. Any help is appreciated. They are on Com3 and 4 respectively.
TTYs2
and TTYs3

This is the second version of Suse I have tried. Thanks.
What are the initialization strings that I would need for #1, 2 and 3?



Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem #1
07-17-2006 21:33:05.921 - File: C:\WINDOWS\system32\tapisrv.dll, Version
5.1.2600
snip
AT+GMM - Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem
H.324 video-ready rev. 1.0
snip
ATI4 - 537EP Release 4.58.1 - Nov 20 2003 - 22:00:59
ATI5 - CP Code Location: Host PC
DSP Code Location: Host PC
Host Interface: PCI
ATI6 - DSP Software Version : 2.15.25.0
ATI7 - OK

Modem type: MDP7800-U Modem #2
snip
ATI1 - E851
ATI2 - OK
ATI3 - LT V.92 Data+Fax Modem Version 8.28
ATI4 - 72
ATI5 - 8.28,0,19,11C1,0441,122D,4100
ATI6 - OK
ATI7 - OK

It looks like you have an Intel chipset modem and Lucent chipset modem. I
think have used modems using those chipsets with GNU/Linux, but not using
the Windows drivers (as it appears you are attempting to do.) I compiled
the kernel driver. I like using the native driver, but I realize
compiling anything can be intimidating to some users. This post explains
what I did for the Intel modem.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.hardware/msg/e21cbc96c1d6cf85

The updated source for the drive is here (oops, split url below):

http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/T8Clearance.aspx?
url=/9266/eng/Intel-536EP-4.71.tgz&agr=Y&ProductID=977&DwnldID=9266&lang=eng

Check www.linmodems.org for the status of your Lucent chipset modem.

If you don't want to compile the driver, then the best advice may
be for you to get an external modem. They usually work "out of the box."

--
Douglas Mayne
Back to top
Douglas Mayne
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 378

PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Modem Problem with Suse Version 10.1 Reply with quote

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:54:36 -0500, Clois Beckwith wrote:

Quote:
Can someone look at these two modem queries, neither one works under 10.1
Suse. Any help is appreciated. They are on Com3 and 4 respectively. TTYs2
and TTYs3

This is the second version of Suse I have tried. Thanks.
What are the initialization strings that I would need for #1, 2 and 3?



Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem #1
07-17-2006 21:33:05.921 - File: C:\WINDOWS\system32\tapisrv.dll, Version
5.1.2600
snip
AT+GMM - Intel(R) 537EP V9x DF PCI Modem
H.324 video-ready rev. 1.0
snip
ATI4 - 537EP Release 4.58.1 - Nov 20 2003 - 22:00:59
ATI5 - CP Code Location: Host PC
DSP Code Location: Host PC
Host Interface: PCI
ATI6 - DSP Software Version : 2.15.25.0
ATI7 - OK

Modem type: MDP7800-U Modem #2
snip
ATI1 - E851
ATI2 - OK
ATI3 - LT V.92 Data+Fax Modem Version 8.28
ATI4 - 72
ATI5 - 8.28,0,19,11C1,0441,122D,4100
ATI6 - OK
ATI7 - OK

It looks like you have an Intel chipset modem and Lucent chipset modem. I

think have used modems using those chipsets with GNU/Linux, but not using
the Windows drivers (as it appears you are attempting to do.) I compiled
the kernel driver. I like using the native driver, but I realize
compiling anything can be intimidating to some users. This post explains
what I did for the Intel modem.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.hardware/msg/e21cbc96c1d6cf85

The updated source for the drive is here (oops, split url below):

http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/T8Clearance.aspx?
url=/9266/eng/Intel-536EP-4.71.tgz&agr=Y&ProductID=977&DwnldID=9266&lang=eng

Check www.linmodems.org for the status of your Lucent chipset modem.

If you don't want to compile the driver, then the best advice may
be for you to get an external modem. They usually work "out of the box."

--
Douglas Mayne
Back to top
dieymir
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:40 am    Post subject: Re: Disk Controller Problem of SiS 5571 chipset in LINUX ??? Reply with quote

Susan wrote:

Quote:
Dear Dances With Crows

Thanks for your kindly reply, but I want to know that HDD's Ultra DMA
Problem of SiS 5571 chipset, not USB problem.


In general, SiS5571 chipset has Disk Controller Problem related to Ultra
DMA mode in the Unix-like OS, such as Linux, *BSDs, etc.

This chipset uses and old version of SiS 5513 IDE controller that doesn't

support UDMA only MWDMA-16 (according to the sources of sis5513.c). So
there isn't any problem with Linux/*BSDs is a limitation of the chipset
itself.

Hope this helps.
Back to top
chuck@nil.car
*nix forums Guru Wannabe


Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 100

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Disk Controller Problem of SiS 5571 chipset in LINUX ??? Reply with quote

dieymir <dieymir@yahoo.es> wrote in news:e9388p$rdl$1@hefestos.uned.es:

Quote:
Susan wrote:

Dear Dances With Crows

Thanks for your kindly reply, but I want to know that HDD's Ultra DMA
Problem of SiS 5571 chipset, not USB problem.


In general, SiS5571 chipset has Disk Controller Problem related to
Ultra DMA mode in the Unix-like OS, such as Linux, *BSDs, etc.

Please advise me about above problem!

I also want to use my old pentium PC (200Mhz Pentium MMX) with
SiS5571 Motherboard.

Susan
13 Jul 2006

According to the sources in sis5513.c ver. 0.16ac+vp (your integrated
IDE controller is actually an early version of SiS 5513) this chipset
version is not capable of UDMA only MWDMA-16. This is not a limitation
or 'problem' of *NIX but a limitation of the chip itself.

Hope this helps.



Just as an aside, I have a machine with a 5513 chipset in it that
doesn't do UDMA because the computer doesn't need that speed. It runs
linux too BTW and it's only a 166Mhz P1 with 64 Meg.

--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
Back to top
dieymir
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Disk Controller Problem of SiS 5571 chipset in LINUX ??? Reply with quote

Susan wrote:

Quote:
Dear Dances With Crows

Thanks for your kindly reply, but I want to know that HDD's Ultra DMA
Problem of SiS 5571 chipset, not USB problem.


In general, SiS5571 chipset has Disk Controller Problem related to Ultra
DMA mode in the Unix-like OS, such as Linux, *BSDs, etc.

Please advise me about above problem!

I also want to use my old pentium PC (200Mhz Pentium MMX) with SiS5571
Motherboard.

Susan
13 Jul 2006

According to the sources in sis5513.c ver. 0.16ac+vp (your integrated IDE

controller is actually an early version of SiS 5513) this chipset version
is not capable of UDMA only MWDMA-16. This is not a limitation or 'problem'
of *NIX but a limitation of the chip itself.

Hope this helps.
Back to top
Binary
*nix forums addict


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:03 am    Post subject: Re: sync between two PCs Reply with quote

I find rsync can do this for me.


Markus Schoder wrote:
Quote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (18 Jun 2006 08:00:03 -0700) it happened "Binary"
binary.chen@gmail.com> wrote in
1150642803.922937.271760@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Hi,

I have two PC, one in office, one in home. I have installed the Ubuntu
in home pc, and also installed a lot of softwares. Now I want to copy
the entire system to office PC, is there any backup method to transfer
all the system of home to office?

The two PC is different.

No
You will need to install the OS and then the applications again on the
other PC.

Hardware will be different, different drivers and configuration....
If the hardware is exactly the same, you could copy disk content
perhaps...

If you compiled the other apps from source, and have the source tree in
one place, you could write that to DC or DVD, copy it to the other PC, and
do 'make clean' 'make install'.....

Or if rmps, just copy those rpms and do rpm -ivh on each...
might just work (in the right sequence...)

At least it once was that simple....
Recompile kernel and drivers too.....

Under some fairly general assumptions you can very well just copy a complete
installation except the kernel and kernel modules from one PC to the other.

Obviously the machines must be binary compatible (i.e. both say x86). What
you very roughly need to do is:

1. Pack your whole / directory hierarchy into a (compressed) tar archive
excluding some directories (e.g. /tmp /dev /proc /sysfs /mnt). Make sure
the filesystem is not modified during the backup (boot from a live CD and
mount read-only).
2. Boot target PC from a live CD and set up networking.
3. Partition and format target PC's drives.
4. Transfer tar archive from source to target PC.
5. Extract archive and create additional directories
(e.g. /tmp /dev /proc /sysfs /mnt)
6. Edit /etc/fstab to match new drive names.
7. Install new kernel on target PC and set up boot-loader.
8. Reboot.

Only recommended for experienced users but certainly doable.

(followup set to: comp.os.linux.setup).
Back to top
onetitfemme
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 2:25 am    Post subject: Re: compiling the kernel via make oldconfig Reply with quote

Again what I need is a detailed documentation on all flags and
configuration variables used during compilation of the kernel sources and
the dependencies among them. My goal is studying them/understanding the
compilation process in depth not compiling the kernel per se.
..
Thanks

Perianayagam Somasundaram wrote:

Quote:
Copy the old .config file. Do a make menuconfig and DO NOT
configure anything. Just exit by saving. And then do a normal
make vmlinux or whatever you do. This works for me!
S

On Wed, 10 May
2006, otf wrote:

Hi,
.
I need to compile the kernel the monkey way from its sources' tarballs
(no fancy portage, deb or anything similar) from the .config file with
shell scripts via:
.
make oldconfig
.
in one shot (no prompts).
.
The thing is that I haven't been able to find detailed documentation on
all flags and configuration variables used during compilation of the
kernel sources and the dependencies among them.
.
Where could I find detailed information about it?
.
Thanx
lbrtchx


Back to top
Perianayagam Somasundaram
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:34 pm    Post subject: Re: compiling the kernel via make oldconfig Reply with quote

Copy the old .config file. Do a make menuconfig and DO NOT
configure anything. Just exit by saving. And then do a normal
make vmlinux or whatever you do. This works for me!
S

On Wed, 10 May
2006, otf wrote:

Quote:
Hi,
.
I need to compile the kernel the monkey way from its sources' tarballs (no
fancy portage, deb or anything similar) from the .config file with shell
scripts via:
.
make oldconfig
.
in one shot (no prompts).
.
The thing is that I haven't been able to find detailed documentation on all
flags and configuration variables used during compilation of the kernel
sources and the dependencies among them.
.
Where could I find detailed information about it?
.
Thanx
lbrtchx



--
S
*************************************************************************
"I've never understood how God could expect his creatures
to pick the one true religion by faith - it strikes me as a
sloppy way to run a universe."
Robert A. Heinlein
STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND
*************************************************************************
Back to top
william lebel
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:29 pm    Post subject: Re: can I run linux from a CD, without installing it? Reply with quote

Take the ubuntu live cd
"DarkTemplar" <d4rkt3mpl4r@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1146142132.799279.214600@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Give slax a try.
http://slax.linux-live.org/
Back to top
DarkTemplar
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:48 pm    Post subject: Re: can I run linux from a CD, without installing it? Reply with quote

Give slax a try.
http://slax.linux-live.org/
Back to top
Bengt Samuelsson
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:52 pm    Post subject: Apache->PHP-mail()->sendmail problem Debian 3.1 Reply with quote

Hi!

I can´t send mail from my webserver!

I run
Linux Debian 3.1
Apache 1.3.3
PHP 4.4.4
sendmail 8.13.4

Something special to lock after?
Please send a copy to bengt@sm7jqb.se too!

I use a local network/domain *.sm7jqb.lan

Yes sendmail is running and I can send mail localy.

I can send mail using Kmail to use sendmail localy,
but I can't use smtp.sm7jqb.lan' as I want to do do from my XP-box.

I want to send mail from evrtone in *.sm7jqb.lan
I want to send mail from "PHP-mail()" running in this Linux-box user
'www-data'

A line from /var/log/mail.log
Apr 24 17:09:27 sm7jqb sendmail[6003]: k3OF9R8g006003:
from=www-data, size=81, class=0, nrcpts=0,
msgid=<200604241509.k3OF9R8g006003@sm7jqb.dnsalias.com>,
relay=www-data@localhost

generated from this code
<?php
if ( mail('apache@sm7jqb.se','Testmail !!','Hej, bara testar',
'From:bengt@sm7jqb.se') )
print "<br />Skickade epost";
else
print "<br />Skickade INTE epost";
?>
and I got the message "Skickade INTE epost"

And my /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
define(`_USE_ETC_MAIL_')dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VERSIONID(`$Id: sendmail.mc, v 8.13.4-3sarge1 2006-03-22 22:41:17 cowboy Exp
$')
OSTYPE(`debian')dnl
DOMAIN(`debian-mta')dnl
dnl # Items controlled by /etc/mail/sendmail.conf - DO NOT TOUCH HERE
undefine(`confHOST_STATUS_DIRECTORY')dnl #DAEMON_HOSTSTATS=
dnl # Items controlled by /etc/mail/sendmail.conf - DO NOT TOUCH HERE
dnl #
dnl # General defines
dnl #
define(`SMART_HOST',`mail.tele2.se') dnl
dnl #
dnl # SAFE_FILE_ENV: [undefined] If set, sendmail will do a chroot()
dnl # into this directory before writing files.
dnl # If *all* your user accounts are under /home then use that
dnl # instead - it will prevent any writes outside of /home !
dnl # define(`confSAFE_FILE_ENV', `')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Daemon options - restrict to servicing LOCALHOST ONLY !!!
dnl # Remove `, Addr=' clauses to receive from any interface
dnl # If you want to support IPv6, switch the commented/uncommentd lines
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
dnl # DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl
dnl # DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission,
Addr=::1')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MTA-v4, Port=smtp')dnl
dnl # DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MTA-v4-1, Port=smtp,
Addr=mail.sm7jqb.lan')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MSP-v4, Port=submission')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Be somewhat anal in what we allow
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',dnl
`needmailhelo,needexpnhelo,needvrfyhelo,restrictqrun,restrictexpand,nobodyreturn,authwarnings')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Define connection throttling and window length
define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE', `15')dnl
define(`confCONNECTION_RATE_WINDOW_SIZE',`10m')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Features
dnl #
dnl # The access db is the basis for most of sendmail's checking
FEATURE(`access_db', , `skip')dnl
dnl # FEATURE(access_db[, type /etc/mail/access])dnldnl #
dnl # The greet_pause feature stops some automail bots - but check the
dnl # provided access db for details on excluding localhosts...
FEATURE(`greet_pause', `1000')dnl 1 seconds
dnl #
dnl # Delay_checks allows sender<->recipient checking
FEATURE(`delay_checks', `friend', `n')dnl
dnl #
dnl # If we get too many bad recipients, slow things down...
define(`confBAD_RCPT_THROTTLE',`3')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Stop connections that overflow our concurrent and time connection
rates
FEATURE(`conncontrol', `nodelay', `terminate')dnl
FEATURE(`ratecontrol', `nodelay', `terminate')dnl
dnl #
dnl # If you're on a dialup link, you should enable this - so sendmail
dnl # will not bring up the link (it will queue mail for later)
dnl define(`confCON_EXPENSIVE',`True')dnl
dnl #
FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Masquerading options
FEATURE(`always_add_domain')dnl
MASQUERADE_AS(`localhost.localdomain')dnl
FEATURE(`allmasquerade')dnl
FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')dnl
dnl #
dnl # Default Mailer setup
MAILER_DEFINITIONS
MAILER(`local')dnl
MAILER(`smtp')dnl


Some more lines from /var/log/mail.log
Apr 25 19:20:14 sm7jqb sendmail[13911]: k3PHKEwa013911: from=www-data,
size=81, class=0, nrcpts=0,
msgid=<200604251720.k3PHKEwa013911@sm7jqb.dnsalias.com>,
relay=www-data@localhost

Apr 25 19:20:27 sm7jqb sendmail[13913]: k3PHKRtb013913: from=www-data,
size=81, class=0, nrcpts=0,
msgid=<200604251720.k3PHKRtb013913@sm7jqb.dnsalias.com>,
relay=www-data@localhost

Apr 25 19:31:32 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14586]: k3PHEmp1013887:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=00:16:44, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=210349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Apr 25 19:31:32 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14586]: k3PFFJUm005386:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=02:16:13, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=1830349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Apr 25 19:31:32 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14586]: k3PFGmL7005400:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=02:14:44, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=1830349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Apr 25 19:40:02 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14652]: k3PHEmp1013887:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=00:25:14, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=300349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Apr 25 19:40:02 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14652]: k3PFFJUm005386:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=02:24:43, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=1920349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]

Apr 25 19:40:02 sm7jqb sm-msp-queue[14652]: k3PFGmL7005400:
to=linux@sm7jqb.se, delay=02:23:14, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=1920349, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:
Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]


--
73 dé SM7JQB
Back to top
Bengt Samuelsson
*nix forums beginner


Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Apache->PHP-mail()->sendmail problem Debian 3.1 Reply with quote

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

Quote:

"Bengt Samuelsson" <bengt@remove.sm7jqb.se> wrote in message
news:Xns97AD2056B8349pdp8dec@192.71.180.100...
Hi!

I can´t send mail from my webserver!
I CAN send mail all ather ways thrue sendmail.
Even 'gethostbyname()' don´t work!

I run Apache 1.3.3
PHP 4.3.0
sendmail 8.13.4

Something special to lock after?

Please send a copy to bengt@sm7jqb.se too!

73 dé Bengt

You've neglected to say which Linux release you are using,
I am running Debian 3.1


Quote:
and your network configuration.
I run in a small local network .sm7jqb.lan


Quote:
Is sendmail actually running?
Yes sendmail is running.


Quote:
Can the machine send mail to itself
Now we are talking bissnis Smile

I had problem ti set up Kmail to use sendmail localy, but it goes fine to
use 'smtp.sm7jqb.lan' as I do from my XP-box.
'mail.sm7jqb.lan' -> 44.140.249.65 the same box as localhost -> 127.0.0.1

Quote:
locally?

Are there messages in /var/log/maillog about it?
Yes!

Apr 24 17:09:27 sm7jqb sendmail[6003]: k3OF9R8g006003:
from=www-data, size=81, class=0, nrcpts=0,
msgid=<200604241509.k3OF9R8g006003@sm7jqb.dnsalias.com>,
relay=www-data@localhost

from this code
<?php
if ( mail('apache@sm7jqb.se','Testmail !!','Hej, bara testar',
'From:bengt@sm7jqb.se') )
print "<br />Skickade epost";
else
print "<br />Skickade INTE epost";
?>
and I got "Skickade INTE epost"

Quote:
What do your /etc/sendmail/*.mc files say?
it is /etc/mail/sendmail.mc

#
define(`_USE_ETC_MAIL_')dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VERSIONID(`$Id: sendmail.mc, v 8.13.4-3sarge1 2006-03-22 22:41:17 cowboy Exp
$')
OSTYPE(`debian')dnl
DOMAIN(`debian-mta')dnl
undefine(`confHOST_STATUS_DIRECTORY')dnl #DAEMON_HOSTSTATS=
define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `sm7jqb.dnsalias.com')dnl
define(`SMART_HOST',`mail.tele2.se')dnl
define(`confDEF_USER_ID',``8:12'')dnl
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`EXTERNAL LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
define(`confTRY_NULL_MX_LIST',true)dnl
define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',true)dnl
define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')dnl
define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/aliases')dnl
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
Addr=::1')dnl
dnl define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',dnl
`needmailhelo,needexpnhelo,needvrfyhelo,restrictqrun,restrictexpand,nobodyreturn,authwarnings')dnl
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,novrfy,noexpn,restrictqrun')dnl
undefine(`UUCP_RELAY')dnl
define(`PROCMAIL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/procmail')dnl
define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/aliases')dnl
define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl
FEATURE(`accept_unresolvable_domains')dnl
FEATURE(`accept_unqualified_senders')dnl
FEATURE(access_db)
FEATURE(`greet_pause', `1000')dnl 1 seconds

dnl # Default Mailer setup
MAILER_DEFINITIONS
MAILER(`local')dnl
MAILER(`smtp')dnl
MAILER(`uucp')dnl
Cwlocalhost.localdomain dnl


--
73 dé SM7JQB
Back to top
Mark South
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm    Post subject: Re: can I run linux from a CD, without installing it? Reply with quote

On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 02:52:00 +0000, Unruh wrote:

Quote:
"xian_hong2046@hotmail.com" <xian_hong2046@hotmail.com> writes:

Thanks! If I boot from Knoppix, is there a way that I can install
additional software, which is not included in the bundle? Since
Knoppix doesn't touch the harddisk, I guess one can't install extra
software. Is there to get around?

You would have to install it onto the disk. You could mount the windows
partition and install the stuff on there.
You obvioulsy cannot install them onto the CD.

It's not that obvious.

As a matter of fact, Puppy Linux allows you to install extra software to
the CD (even without using a CD-RW) using its multisession
technology/trickery (delete as appropriate).

--
mark south; echo znexfbhgu2000@lnubb.pb.hx|tr a-z n-za-m
"I can trace my ancestry back to a protoplasmal primordial atomic
globule. Consequently, my family pride is something inconceivable."
-- Gilbert & Sullivan, The Mikado
Back to top
Nico Kadel-Garcia
*nix forums Guru


Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 1068

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:37 pm    Post subject: Re: can I run linux from a CD, without installing it? Reply with quote

***** charles wrote:
Quote:
xian_hong2046@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145780299.875998.165140@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Thanks to all of your replies! I'm using a laptop, which makes it
harder to get another harddisk. USB harddrive is a solution that
I'll consider. On the other hand, is it a lot slower to access a
USB drive?

Thanks,
xian

Most people are price sensative. When they find out how much SPEED
costs, they ususally say "well, I don't need that much speed". You
can get a new USB external box and stick a used 20G hd in it for
under $50 just for experimental stuff and education.

Many of those external boxes, however, just plain suck. I've only had one
out of 3 of these actually work without having to return and replace the
external box: the other two were broken right out of the box.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 30 [441 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2, 3, ..., 28, 29, 30 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:44 pm | All times are GMT
navigation Forum index » *nix » Linux » Setup
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Install suse from USB without BIOS support vjy04 Suse 0 Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:57 am
No new posts Install suse from USB without BIOS support vjy04 Suse 0 Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:56 am
No new posts Install suse from USB without BIOS support vjy04 Suse 0 Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:56 am
No new posts Install suse from USB without BIOS support vjy04 Suse 0 Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:55 am
No new posts RS6000 43p/140 AIX 4.3 new install - am stuck! remllov99x AIX 0 Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:07 pm

Reptile Tank | Bad Credit Mortgages | Internet Advertising | Internet Advertising | Loan
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
 
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Unix/Linux blog |  electronics forum |  medicine forum |  science forum | 
Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 2.1114s ][ Queries: 16 (1.7885s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]